Insights
Analytics answers "how am I doing?". Insights answers a narrower and more urgent question: am I going to pass, and what do I need to change?
It is built around evaluations. Everything on the page is pointed at whether your current numbers clear a firm's rules, and what would have to move if they don't.
The four gauges
Insights opens with the same four scores as Analytics: Edge Score, Win Quality, Consistency, and Risk Control. Same thresholds too, so Edge Score stays unscored below 40 trades and the others below 20, and the scoring bands are identical, so a given history produces the same number on both pages. The bands are published under how the gauges score.
They are here because an evaluation is not passed by a good week. A high Consistency score is what tells you a result is repeatable rather than one lucky day, and that distinction is exactly what most firms write a rule about.
Prop Eval Tracker
Enter your firm's rules once and the tracker shows live progress against each of them.
| Rule | What it tracks |
|---|---|
| Profit Target | Net P&L against the target, as a progress bar |
| Max Drawdown | Your worst drawdown against the limit, with remaining buffer, and a drawdown type setting so trailing and static rules are measured correctly |
| Daily Loss | Today's loss against the daily limit, with remaining buffer |
| Consistency Rule | The largest share of your total profit that came from any single day, against the firm's percentage cap |
The consistency check is the one people trip over. It scans every profitable day, works out each one's share of total profit, and reports the largest as PASS or FAIL against your configured percentage. A trader up $4,000 with $2,600 of it from one session fails a 50% rule while looking comfortably profitable everywhere else on the platform.
Set a starting balance and the tracker also reports account balance alongside the rules.
What-If Simulator
Four sliders, each starting at your actual current value:
- Win rate
- Average win
- Average loss
- Trades per day
Move any of them and the projection updates live, including the projection line on the chart. It is the fastest way to answer "what would actually get me there": whether you need to win more often, win bigger, lose smaller, or trade more.
The usual finding is that the smallest change is not the obvious one. Traders reach for win rate first, when tightening the average loss by a modest amount often moves the projection further.
Monte Carlo
Running the simulation samples your actual trade P&L distribution at random, repeatedly, and reports:
- Pass probability
- Median outcome
- Average days to pass
- Worst case (10th percentile) and best case (90th percentile)
- Average max drawdown
- The profit target it measured against
The worst-case figure is the one worth sitting with. A strategy with a healthy median can still show a 10th percentile that breaches your drawdown limit, and that is the run that ends an evaluation.
Simulations resample your own historical trades. They assume your future trades look like your past ones, which is exactly the assumption that breaks when you change markets, size, or approach. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Adjust the What-If sliders and re-run to see how a change in behavior moves your pass probability. That comparison is what the tool is good for, more than any single number it produces.
Coaching Insights
Alongside the gauges, the page surfaces written observations from your own data, flagged by severity. Rule breaches such as a failed consistency check appear here as well as in the tracker, so the things most likely to end an evaluation are stated in plain language rather than left for you to infer from a chart.